Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor continues to disrupt the article after multiple reversions. ✶Quxyz 02:08, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2601:1C2:C087:8DC0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs are continually trying to close the AfD, in breach of WP:NACIP. LibStar (talk) 02:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Supports Russia and has repeatedly condemned Ukraine. The Invasion and the war altogether are contentious topics. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 02:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: For his political status and relationship with North Korea. MersmanD (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Aoidh (talk) 03:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If he were to have been under ECP, why not Yoon Suk Yeol, and Kim's ancestors and predecessors? What about the Jeonju Kim clan, in which the Kims were from, what about Jeonju, South Korea? That's where the Kim family's roots are from. So if you want EDCP for Kim, all of these have to, too. All are in the same topic. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 03:23, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP users. Areaseven (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: IP user continuously attempts to add an endorsement on the page cited to social media posts, in violation of WP:ENDORSE, which states that "lists of endorsements should only include endorsements which have been covered by reliable independent sources." Despite being told this over and over again, they refuse to listen. Here's a quote from their most recent edit summary: "WP:ENDORSE requires endorsements to be 'verifiable by reliable sources' but does not mandate that they be covered solely by independent sources." This was after I sent them the aforementioned quote. I feel like I'm bashing my head against the wall, I don't know how to reason with this person. Please do something about this because I'm afraid they're never going to stop. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection as he is being sworn in as Prime Minister of Canada on Friday and the page has already attracted IP vandalism. Wellington Bay (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Frequent rate of vandalism, especially since it is currently featured in ITN. PrimalMustelid (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism on contentious subject in the news. BobFromBrockley (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent IP user(s) preemptively changing infobox parameters in light of recent news of the expected changeover from Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney. Leventio (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor resumed disruptive speedy deletion tagging after prior protection expried. Jfire (talk) 04:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing - sockpuppetry from IP known for WP:GENREWARRIOR. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:06, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The subject receives occasional antisemitism. (CC) Tbhotch 05:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep inserting "Greek Cypriot" and similar, with no citations. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IP addresses based in Poland Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 07:31, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: There is a back and forth over what image should be used in the infobox. Since this just happened, semi protection temporarily would prevent constant image changing by IP addresses. Ktkvtsh (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    This is the Siddhaṃ script for Siddhaṃ script. I see rectangles, but it might work for some. It might be create-protected for a reason, though. JayCubby 18:30, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I don’t know quite what you’re asking for here but article titles are written using the English language on this wiki. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Good catch. I was asking for the creation of a redirect to Siddham script. JayCubby 02:56, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That looks like an appropriate WP:RLOTE to me. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.